This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. ( access ...../summons.html) SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE". |
the human-rights web site |
Page Revised: January 05, 2000.
All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page
YOUR RIGHTS in law
We recognise that the vast majority of citizens in the UK have suffered from loss of property (do note that the word covers much more than the tangible, such as peace of mind, and YOUR time, the right to engage in other gainful activities instead of chasing after and swimming in the corrupted minefields of our ABUSED legal system) through the usual manifestations the legal 'boffins' indulge in. In the circumstances we draw the public's attention to the first provisions below (ECoHR), as a priority and assurance that the law is not an ass. Our founder has maintained, for over thirty years, that an ass is the person who believes such assertions and ILL directed nonsense. Further evidence that the Law is no ass has now been provided by the ruling from the House of Lords in farcical Pinochet hearings. Their Lordships determined that the costs in that case MUST BE MET from public funds because one of their Lordships sitting in on the case FAILED TO DECLARE his connection and interests in Amnesty International. WHAT about the judges failing to declare their interests AND THEIR PART in the corrupt practices of the legal boffins, in every case we draw attention to?
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECoHR) under Article 1 of the First Protocol Provides for the abusive use of any facilities that violate principles of INTERNATIONAL LAW through which the conversion of the assets (property) of the victim citizens to alleged legal / legitimate court costs (as 'arranged' discretionary under our corrupt system):-
" Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of HIS possessions. NO ONE shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and SUBJECT to the conditions provided for by law AND BY THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES of INTERNATIONAL LAW." and "The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes and or other contributions or penalties". NOTE:- This provision in International Law is the most frequently violated right by public servants in the United Kingdom. In particular by the Legal/Judicial/Police Mafia that operates freely within the United kingdom care of the much promoted and revered independence of 'judicial chair occupants'; persons who act injudiciously as exemplified in "The Downing Street Years", in "The Breeding grounds-case", in "The Geoffrey Harold Scriven-case", in "The "Norman Scarth-case", in "The Paul Jenkins - case", in "The Mary Winch-case", in "The Robert Owen - case" and many more. Details of which all, we shall be publishing as we go along for the benefit of the much tested British citizens primarily; also for the citizens of the world at large to note and marvel at the capabilities of those who systematically misuse their public office in contravention of every principle of law, through breaches of criminal law and violations of International Law.
IF you have reasons to believe that your rights HAVE been violated and in particular by and through abuse of the legal system / courts service COMPLAIN through your Member of Parliament to the Lord Chancellor's Department. Report also your complaint and the reasons WHY and HOW to the police. Point out the CoA ruling/proclamation we publish under the heading (link to:) FRAUD VITIATES JUDGEMENTS*. Link also to, and read the 'Theft and Counterfeit' (forgery) provisions in Download it, read and digest the full scope of the various acts. Consider The Law in the light of YOUR own experiences with public servants such as the police and judges who may have 'failed' you. Apply knowledge of facts to 'The Law' and remember that crime is for the police to investigate and prosecute. E-mail brief details to:<http://violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk>.
NOTE: (1) Contributions or penalties does not include abuse of the court's processes by the dishonest and criminals who have free access to and use of ALL court facilities at their disposal*. Even on a Saturday, when the courts are closed, as Mr G H Scriven points out in his affidavit. The uncontrolled and unsupervised, in our alleged democracy, ought not to be allowed to corrode the foundations of it. Democracy must be seen to be resting and founded on the rule of law. It cannot be allowed to be a monocracy where the lowest of the low, in any public position, feel free to act outside the law assured that along the line others will seek to absolve him/her through misconduct in public office; if anything for fear of exposing the depth of the rot in our society. Corrupt Britain trumpeted Paul Johnson in the Daily Mail; when the rot is in the foundations nothing but a rebuilt structure will do. The architects must either abandon the old tools of their trade or be replaced with persons prepared to built 'anew'.
(2). The provisions ARE CLEAR. However, if a citizen is subjected to abusive use of official facilities re:- taxes and other penalties imposed, leading to abuse of the exceptions above provided, the question arises of HOW FAR and HOW DEEP the organised institutionalised DEPRIVATION AND VIOLATION OF RIGHTS? There exist citizens in the United Kingdom fighting the very issues and the violations of their rights in law.
(3) Inevitably power corrupts. Let loose and free to act outside Parliament's law and the provisions of INTERNATIONAL LAW. Abuse of the independence of the judiciary principle has been allowed to take over from the rule of law. Misconduct in public office and violations imposed through alleged legitimate legal costs leading to and followed by DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS TO AND PROPERTIES, and no remedy in law because the law exists not for criminals. No provisions in the United Kingdom for an authority proper to oversee and investigate complaints. No facility to comply with the provisions of Article 13 of the ECoHR. No AUTHORITY PROPER TO OVERSEE AND SUPERVISE the judiciary, therefrom the officially accepted and established rights of the judiciary to railroad and hijack court actions as they please or as they are allowed to 'practice' and or are instructed by the state to do. The state always absolving itself on the very grounds of the much revered, promoted from within, and ABUSED 'independence' of the judiciary 'principle'; the freedom to abuse facility. Judiciary who consciously and with intent misuse their public office and enter not into JUDICIOUS rulings founded and resting on the facts and or the evidence of each case before them but only on what they choose and can be used FOR the benefit of the circles from within which they arose to public office. SIMPLY GENERATING INCOME and MORE court cases (from appeals to new actions) to which naturally are attached alleged legitimate legal costs. THE ESTABLISHED MILKING OF THE COW PRACTICE. Graphically depicted in the cartoon that adorns the walls in every barrister's chambers. The creator of that cartoon failed to place a judge in the clouds above acting as self appointed GOD stretching out his arms HOLDING IN PLACE the two litigants who are fighting over the cow being milked dry by the legal professions. Food for thought for the present United Kingdom government who made specific and clear promises when in opposition through its spokes person on Legal Affairs, the Rt. Hon. Paul Boateng, now Minister of State.
AND under Article 2 of the First Protocol, the ECoHR also Provides:-
"NO person shall be denied the right to education. In the exercise of ANY functions which IT ASSUMES in relation to education and to TEACHING (this includes ALL established practices and examples set by public servants and or officials), the State SHALL RESPECT THE RIGHT OF PARENTS (do note PLURAL) TO ENSURE SUCH EDUCATION AND TEACHING IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THEIR OWN RELIGIOUS AND PHILOSOPHICAL CONVICTIONS. (i.e:not as imposed and or determined by quangos and or politically WRONGLY MOTIVATED individuals and atheists who have no respect for the rights and the WILL of the citizens they treat as morons and or as illiterate serfs of the middle ages and or as persons who believe, follow and practice the very principles of the IMPOSTORS; those who impose their DICTATES on the citizens in an alleged Democracy, such as the United Kingdom proclaims itself to be).
WE publish below a letter Andrew, our founder, sent to 'The Times' newspaper. IT WAS NOT PUBLISHED by the self appointed CENSOR and promoter of the ills the society in the United Kingdom is faced with. The editor, and others, HAVING predetermined WHAT society they ARE CREATING there was and there is no cause to pretend to know of the rights of parents UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.
insert file re school teaching son HIS RIGHTS after an explicit article 'The Times'
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECoHR) under Article 2 Provides:-
" Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived ....." and under Article 2 (the ECoHR) Provides:- " No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.... "
NOW consider the case of the mother (link to Summons issued) of the young lady to whom we have dedicated this web-site and consider the situation of both the mother and the young lady. WHO ARE responsible for the ENCOURAGEMENT of the father to violate the rights of both mother and daughter? WHO ARE STILL TORMENTING AND TORTURING THE MOTHER? Setting aside the blatant invitations/contract (by the cruel father of the young lady) in the underworld for the disposal of the brother of the bereaved mother? WHO but the police failed the mother and her brother as in the Stephen Lawrence affair and ongoing saga? CORRUPT BRITAIN !!!! Trumpeted Paul Johnson in the Daily Mail while the editorial challenged "Time for politicians to tell the truth", the editor forgetting the role the Media play in disinformation and misinformation while shoving the facts of life under the carpets and or in the cupboards of their private salons and clubs.
And further on in the very provisions of the ECoHR article "..... No one shall be required to perform FORCED OR COMPULSORY LABOUR......"
NOW consider the case of EVERY CITIZEN forced to slave over papers, Court documents, manuals and research in libraries SIMPLY BECAUSE THE LEGAL SYSTEM is fraught with fraud as the NEW LABOUR party when in opposition admitted and committed itself to remedy. Your Lordship (we address the Lord Chancellor) WHY ARE THE CITIZENS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM FORCED TO COMPULSORY LABOUR by those who abuse their much revered right to independence and freedom to enter into NON JUDICIOUS DECISIONS? Do consider also the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to which we have drawn the attention of the world and the citizens of these islands. ABOVE all to consider the very declarations of senior judges who point out, at every opportunity, that "NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, least of all those who are presumed to know of it before accepting appointments to judicial office and taking the Judicial Oath."
IT IS FOR PARLIAMENT through the Lord Chancellor and the Home Office to ACT.
THE PUBLIC, the ordinary citizen, MUST BE PROTECTED from the rogues who operate illegally within the legal system.
Links to: Updated Pages LATEST News Fraud Vitiates Judgements The LAW
Links to: Facilities at their Disposal
Revised: January 05, 2000
Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.