In alphabetical order

Introduction to the cases with links to the pages under preparation

Forgeries victim  1 Theft of Moneys  2 DSS H/B Frauds 3 Criminal Damgs  4 Denial of Rights  5 Legal Aid Fraud  6 Police Investigat.7 ....

Englezakis    Mrs No. 2 is Victim of

Family fraud       1 H/B L/A aid fraud2 False Documen. 3 Violence            4 Cruelty by husb. 5 M/W attempts    6 Med.Neg & abov.7 Lawyers             8 Court Officers     9 Obstruction toJ 10 Court Staff         11  Legal Att/Fr.     12 Police investiga.13 SOLICITORS     14  .......

Haralabidis N Mr No. 3 is victim of

Obstructions toJ 1 Medical Profess. 2 VexLit to Block   3 Police/court staff 4 Appl. to Str/burg 5 ....

Jenkins  P      Mr No. 4 is victim of

Bank liberties     1 Lawyers             2 Contractors        3 Court officers      4 Obstructions toJ 5 Appl to Str/burg  6

Owen Robert  Mr No. 5 is victim of

Forgery / theft     1 Bank deceptions 2 Lawyers  ?          Court Officers   ?   Obstructions toJ ?

Scarth N. Mr      No. 6 is victim of

Court officers      1 Obstructions toJ 2 Denial of Rights 3  Strasbourg case 4
CoA Recording   5  Under Siege       6   Police Threats    7 SOLICITORS

Scriven G H Mr.  No. 7 is victim of

POLICE              1
FRAUD at Court 2
FORGERIES     3
SOLICITORS     4
Inept Judges      5 Evidence Ignored 6

Whincup K    Mr No. 7 victim of

Victim of Bank    1 Lawyers ??     Court Officers ??? 

Yiannides A    Mr No. 8 victim of

Forgeries           1  Fraud                 2 Denials of Rights3 R/Discrimination 4 Threats to life     5 Police Forgeries 6 Local Authority   7 Mag. Crt. Fraud  8 SOLICITORS     9  .....

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER. The days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE GUARANTEED under  the European Convention on Human Rights. ECoHR, provides under:-

Article 9.  "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..."  Article 10.  "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION......  to HOLD OPINIONS.....  TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary".  Article 11.  "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION  with others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS".  Article 14. "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this convention shall be secured without discrimination on ANY GROUNDS such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth, or other status.  AND most interestingly the ignored provisions of Article 13. that provides:-  "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY." Article 1. of the First Protocol provides:- "EVERY natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law".

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own?  The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights.

The public at large is called upon to consider the facts stated, THE EVIDENCE PLEADED, USED and RELIED UPON by the victims of the merchants of misery*. The Law Enforcement agencies and in particular the police forces in the United Kingdom are called upon to be vigilant and to treat complaints against the legal/judicial Mafiosi diligently and with utmost sincerity. The Law Enforcement Agencies are maintained at high cost to the revenue providers. Our justice halls are not theatres as the the legal/judicial Mafiosi treat them invariably simply to generate dishonest income for and in the interests of the directors and the actors who are in control of our justice halls, their  theatres.

NO Recordings ?    No Cameras ?  WHY ?

TO Protect which parties ?  No National Security* as the Defence advisory committee accepts and confirms. No justifiable grounds subsist in any case to block exposure of the fraudulent activities and the vile practices of persons who ought to know better.   Most certainly not ALL COURT CASES as the system operates (with assistance from the MEDIA barons in the United Kingdom) merit the shove the complaints and the evidence with the rest of the skeletons in the family closet. Our founder wrote to the Home Office over a decade ago that the closet was bursting open and it could hold no more.

WHY the need to indulge in SECRET hearings of which the targeted victims and parties to court proceedings are not aware of?   Can anyone accept that no sinister and dishonest aims behind such abuses of the courts facilities by the THIEVES of rights in law?  Nothing short of gross violations of Article 6 of the European Convention On Human Rights.  The targeted  victims ALWAYS denied, by the criminals in charge of our courts, access to the Court's processes, such as a straight forward appeal and access to Court records, for obvious reasons.  Alleged court orders purporting to be founded on JUDICIAL rulings resting and founded simply on ABUSE of the Court's facilities*, as the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case clearly established.  His is but a classic example of the practices judicial chair occupants endorse consciously to serve the legal 'boffins' who indulge in fraud on the public through blunt acquiescence by judicial chair occupants. A county Court allegedly was open on a Saturday for the institution of proceedings. How can anyone within our L.E.A's condone, or endorse and acquiesce such FRAUDULENT activities.  FORGED court documents of which we have more at hand; arrogant abuse of court facilities, there for the picking by THE THIEVES OF THE PROPERTIES AND THE RIGHTS IN LAW OF THE CITIZENS. Theft and fraud from within the least acceptable public sector in  the mother of modern Democracy!!!! No wonder a number of MPs rushed to sign an Early Day Motion that, as yet, has to be aired in Parliament while the thieves carry on playing their usual cat and mouse games with their targeted victims.  TORMENT AND TORTURE OF THE CITIZENS as the Stephen  Lawrence family found out. Such activities  within our courts and legal system the police and the government cannot possibly allow be continued. Not in the aftermath of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry.

The public and the world at large is afforded the opportunity, through these pages, to recognise the serious issues RAISED AND COMPLAINED OF through the court cases we publish.  When the RIGHT TO unblemished, untarnished, unadulterated and independent of other influences and or interests Justice is violated, the government has to issue the strictest instructions to the police, as indeed we believe was the case in July 1998. The police must be seen to be acting within the remit of their DUTIES TO SOCIETY and to each and every citizen, no matter who. The mandate under which the police operate is not restricted.  The offenders in the cases we cover, and the citizens were/are forced to fight alone, are persons who should have full knowledge of 'The LAW'; they are, after all, 'certified and licensed professionals'.   Theatrical scenarios and scripts through which to evade the issues, such as FORGERIES by the score, are unacceptable to the citizens who are no longer illiterate serfs of the Middle Ages. The Housing Benefit scams and frauds on the state and the private landlords are the issues the police have been called to prosecute. The copies of the FORGERIES handed to them exposed the activities and the methods used by the Local Authority staff; the police were made aware that letting agents were ignoring 'The LAW' and the rights of their principals. The citizens' rights in law were arrogantly violated through breaches of national Law; CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES WERE indulged in and the agents of the victim defaulted to refer the FORGERIES to the police for over a year; the agents carrying on defaulting to act in the interest of their principal while all (tenant, council staff and agents) simply relied on 'the relevant county court' to ignore 'The LAW' and the rules of procedure at court while in pursuit of other ulterior motives, as they had established and developed over the years. A small group of landlords caused to challenge the constructive frauds lead to our actions and the challenges culminated in the announcement by the Government that Housing Benefit will soon cease being available to the dishonest and the criminals within the confines of the Local Authorities; it will be replaced with a Tax Credit Scheme.  We now await for the investigation proper, by the police, in the case of the FORGERIES used and relied upon by the council staff AND the consequential attempts by council staff and the agents of the landlords leading to additional fraud and CRIMINAL DAMAGES TO the PROPERTY as was indulged into by the encouraged, promoted and used tenant who now denies knowledge of the FORGERIES the council staff and the agents used and relied upon in order to impose their plans for the properties of the targeted victim of all, the landlord; the landlord a victim of the crimes systematically endorsed by 'the relevant county court'; treating citizens and The LAW with contempt. Copy of a succinct and explicit Appeal that was lodged and filed at 'the relevant county court' is available on request <email:- camila@human-rights.demon.co.uk> and include request for copy in the subject line. The Appeal clearly qualified that 'the relevant county court' officers, among other things, simply acquiesced and endorsed FRAUD ON THE Department of Social Security through the misappropriation of Housing Benefit funds. They were made aware of the fact that the council staff could have saved the state funds their tool was stealing; but all were otherwise inclined and involved and they simply ignored the provisions of 'The LAW' (theft/counterfeit). Our comments in our Home Page suffice. 

Link to:  human-rights   Home Page    Merchants of Misery 

Link to:  No National Security

Revised: January 05, 2000.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.

LAG

CAMILA

TAP

CAMILA

SLA

LAG

TAP

h-r

h-r G

LIPS  

TAP

LIPS

TAP

SAFE  

TAP

LIPS

TAP

LIPS  

TAP

SAFE  

TAP

CAMILA

TAP 

LIPS  

h-r

CAP