Fraud Vitiates Judgements

	Sign In Sign-Up

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (access ..../summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

"....I cannot accede to this argument for a moment. No court in this land will allow a person to keep an advantage which he has obtained by fraud. No judgement of a court, no order of a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud. Fraud unravels everything. The court is careful not to find fraud unless it is distinctly pleaded and proved; but ones it is proved it vitiates judgements, contracts and all transactions whatsoever; see as to deeds....... So, here, I am of opinion that if this declaration is proved to have been false and fraudulent, it is a nullity and void......" ( Denning LJ).

There it is in a nutshell. We shall be publishing through our pages, documents that in law were at the time they were first used, and to this day remain and ARE, NOTHING BUT FORGERIES*. And a FORGERY used in order to gain a pecuniary advantage leads to FRAUD. Fraud is fraud and NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, so our legal experts have been professing for centuries. The citizens are no longer illiterate serfs of the middle ages to be used as subjects to the whims of the dishonest.... and or in the manners we are and shall be exposing through this web-site and the explicit TAP pages.

Section 1 of the Counterfeiting Act 1981, qualifies:-"A person is guilty of forgery if he makes a false instrument with the intention that he or another shall use it .......

and in law "..the 'actus reus' of forgery is the making of a false instrument. This obviously includes the original production of an instrument which is false as soon as it is produced".

and ".....a person is to be treated for the purposes of this part of... as making a false instrument if he alters an instrument so as to make it false in any respect whether or not it is false in some other respect apart from the alteration; in other words making includes :-

and "It must also be proved that the person procuring or making the false instrument intended the false instrument to be used so as to induce the person accepting it, to or not to do some act to his own or someone else's prejudice".

and ".... An act or omission intended to be induced, is to a person's prejudice if and only if it is one if it occurs (a) will result (1) in his temporary or permanent loss of property or (2) in his being deprived of an opportunity to earn greater remuneration, or (3) in his being deprived of an opportunity to gain a financial advantage otherwise than by way of remuneration".

and " or will result in somebody being given an opportunity (1) to earn remuneration or greater remuneration from him, or (2) to gain a financial advantage from him otherwise than by way of remuneration, or (3) will be the result of his having accepted a false instrument as genuine in connection with his performance of any duty".

and ".. the concept of an intent to cause prejudice is very similar to that of intent to defraud in the old law. It is sufficient if the maker of the instrument intents some other person to suffer financial loss or somebody else to gain a financial advantage at that person's expense".

and ".. the law on FORGERY is supplemented by two offences under section 20 of The Theft Act 1968: - (1) The offence of procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception contrary to section 20.2 is considered ..... together with the other offences of deceptions. It may be a useful alternative to FORGERY where the instrument is not made by the offender/user himself but by a person whom he has deceived into making it.

and ".. a person who dishonestly with a view to gain for himself or another with intent to cause loss to another destroys, defaces or conceals any valuable security any Will or other testamentary document or any original document of or belonging to filed or deposited in any court of Justice or any government department shall on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years".

It is for the average decent citizens within the UK and the world at large, as jurors, to consider the law and the various false instruments, FORGERIES, used as intended by the offenders in each relevant case, in order to defraud their victims. Those who will be submitting the 'instruments' through these pages for all the world to marvel at, the ingenuity the capabilities and the defaults / omissions of and within the Law Enforcement Agencies. The cases of Geoffrey Harold Scriven brought to the surface the facts of life and the capabilities of the operators of 'the system'. It suffices to point out that in Mr. Scriven's case the court was satisfied for a change, the court did not ignore the evidence. The many cases and the hearings, the victims of which will be submitting through these pages their own case histories; the evidence in support in each instance will be published too in order to challenge the offenders; those who ignored the Law and the Evidence presented to them. It shall then be up to the authorities, the investigative branch of the Law Enforcement Agencies, the police*, to act as the law* provides and to investigate properly, alongside the present high profile investigations into the activities of the 'untouchables'.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.