the human-rights web site

email:- violations@human-rights.freeservers.com

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of   the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her  own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (access ..../summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

Page Revised: January 16, 2000.

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

Hosting The CAMILA Project

The first document we publish below is intended to generate interest and awareness. Those, of you, who share our concerns in the subject matter are invited to partake in the proposed C.A.P’s and T.A.P. Documents that will follow, in the pages of this web-site, are to cover ongoing issues and challenges before the Courts in the United Kingdom. The documents we are, shall and we will be publishing are intended to generate lively debate and interest from WITHIN the United Kingdom and world-wide.

THE CAMILA PROJECT

( Citizens Against Maladministration In Law Application )

email:- acamila@human-rights.demon.co.uk

Submissions to Lawrence Inquiry acknowledged refer to volume 2 of Inquiry...

At The CAMILA Project we aim to keep a data bank of complaints referred to us in respect of our Law Enforcement Agencies (L.E.A’s). This can best be done through co-operation with other organisations and or groups who are themselves familiar with and or come into contact with persons who have had cause or reasons to raise complaints in respect of :-

The Police   The  prime duty of the police IS to protect the citizens FROM Crime. Even when the crime is institutionalised and never mind who is or are involved or engaged in ANY criminal activity.  We have on record many a FORGERY used by the legal professions in Court proceedings; the persons in judicial chairs ignoring The   LAW and the police 'asserting' and relying on alleged 'sub-judice grounds' their FAILURES to challenge all who partake in such activities while the citizens are defrauded of their properties and assets. The organised Legal/Judicial/Police Mafia has been in operation and in perfect harmony with one another for far too long.

The Police Complaints Authority    Its officers ARE DUTY BOUND to ensure the police DO NOT FAIL the citizens.  Especially so after the citizens have complained to senior police officers. And no hint of the usual 'stand by your colleagues' mentality and or the 'COVER IT UP' attitude of public servants within the United Kingdom institutions' treating the citizens as morons with no rights under any law, national or international.

Solicitors and their governing body. The contractual obligations of solicitors,  AS AGENTS for their clients, are governed by LAW; not as misrepresented or asserted through reliance on the established practices of old from within THE SYSTEM THE SOLICITORS OPERATE unhindered'. The citizens always abandoned to challenge on their own blatant malpractice, simply because the policy has always been "Look after the brotherhood".   Collectively solicitors HAVE BEEN FAILING the citizens for centuries. Refer to 'The Pickwick Papers' and 'Bleak House', both by Charles Dickens.  Refer also to the latest report by the Ombudsman on the Legal Services*.

The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors.  The latest in a series of bodies,  set up by the Law Society and maintained by the very masters; allegedly independent of any other influences and or interests (and never mind the indebtedness of the solicitors indemnity fund - its masters).  Its function to deal with complaints against members of the Law Society, its masters.  SELF REGULATION IS NOT WORKING, yet they carry on with the wool over your eyes attitudes of old and the reliance on others from  within a corrupt system to absolve wrong doers and even seasoned criminals. Refer also to the latest report by the Ombudsman on the Legal services.*

Barristers and their governing body. Contrary to popular belief and promotions barristers, as individuals, are also prone to the frailties and the temptations of man; they ARE encouraged by the system operated from within; they too can be called to account. Refer to The Guardian of Friday November 3 1978 'Law Lords ruling "...barristers liable for negligence...").

The Judiciary rise to their public office through the ranks of the legal professions. Like other 'mortals they, too, are subject to the same errors and temptations and or lapses of 'knowledge of ALL LAW and principles of same, as in "The Downing street Years - case"*; better still as in "The Stephen Lawrence - saga"*.

The Court Services.  Maintained and run by public servants who know of the practices through these pages we are challenging. They also know of the consequences in terms of damages the Government, the state has to make good when compensation is called for the victims of 'the practices'. Prejudice and 'NOT to serve the victim' is the priority of public servants. Abandon YOUR rights therefore NOT.   COMPLAIN, complain...

The Lord Chancellor's Department. Ultimately responsible for the conduct of the business of and WITHIN the Courts in the United Kingdom in tandem with the Home Office, as UPHOLDERS of The LAW.

The Home Office through the Home Secretary, ultimately responsible to maintain and protect the rights of EVERY single citizen as provided for by Law; national and international.

The Magistrates Courts  under the Home Office and the Home Secretary linked to the police by virtue of their role as the first step in enforcing Parliament's LAW. 

The Local Authorities  run by politicians and maintained by Public servants. More often than not relying on much the very same 'matter of fact ABUSIVE realities and facts of life from within the legal services the United Kingdom maintains such as we are and shall be raising and challenging.

Collating ALL relevant information from the public is a matter that requires time and effort from others who are familiar with the problems, because they themselves have gone through the motions and know of the frustrations at bureaucracy's doors. Public servants and or individuals from within the self regulating bodies (as maintained at present) in no way assist the public to put their complaints in a form and or presentation that will and or can make sense; quite often brushing the public's genuine and well founded complaints aside as mere 'suspicions' and or as erroneous misinterpretations of events, words and or facts and acts.

The serious issue of FORGERIES by solicitors and the courts* as entertained, endorsed and acquiesced by persons acting / holding Judicial office is a matter for concern by one and all, especially when the police default to investigate / act. Complaints to the Police Complaints Authority lead nowhere. One need only consider ‘Judicious’(?) decisions in connection with forgeries the police used to secure long prison sentences for alleged terrorists and other citizens. At The CAMILA Project we have on record letters evincing such manifestations. A ruling by the Court of Appeal is presently relied upon because it 'bestowed' Public Interest Immunity status to Reports by Investigating Police Officers. In a letter to the Home Secretary (well before such reliance could be advanced by the Police Complaints Authority later, or advanced by Home Office staff) it was pointed out that:-

"WE ARE NOT AT WAR and National Security is not at risk; National Disgrace IS".

The above C.o.A ruling, the Home Secretary (the Rt. Hon. Michael Howard, at the time) was informed, in no way makes up for Open Government; where BE the declared Citizen's Charter? Our Courts excel at creating "INCOME GENERATING CONDITIONS FOR THE CIRCLES FROM WITHIN WHICH THE JUDICIARY ARISE TO PUBLIC OFFICE".

A classic example was the application by "The Sunday Times" for an injunction because of the threatened copyright infringements in respect of "The Downing Street Years". On dismissing the application the C.o.A ruled "We could not grant to you what we would not to the needy and the poor.....This is the wrong application .... Let them (the Mirror newspaper) publish (copy from the book) AND THEN institute proceedings for damages..."

WE all know how such cases are conducted and how long they take! HOW DOES ONE ESTIMATE OR QUANTIFY DAMAGES IN SUCH AN INSTANCE? Better still HOW MUCH DO LEGAL BOFFINS MAKE OUT OF SUCH PROCEEDINGS? ("Best theatre I have been to..." (court)  Richard Branson)

The Editor of The Sunday Times wishing to expose the weeds in Malaysia's Back Gardens alleged corruption (Pergau dam). He commented (in respect of the C.o.A ruling, the Copyright infringement threats by the Daily Mirror, above) "This is a thief's charter" (copyright infringement - license by our Judiciary). The income generating practices and creative conditions were pointed out to the editor of the Sunday Times; his attention was drawn to a simple parallel using the police as an example:- " IT WAS like the parents (copyright owners) of a child (book) held at knife point by a criminal (Daily Mirror) threatening to cut the child to pieces (print extracts) and the parents (copyright owners) calling upon the police (applying to Court/Judges) to stop that crime. AND the police turning round to say "Let him cut the child to pieces WE CAN THEN HAVE A TRIAL FOR MURDER" (Fair comment / holding opinions IS guaranteed to all citizens under the European Convention of Human Rights, as was ratified by the United Kingdom).

Our LEA's are relying on one another and the income generating conditions and practices from within the present framework that is operated by our Legal Services and System. THE CITIZENS HABITUALLY AND SYSTEMATICALLY ARE DENIED FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUAL TREATMENT through financial impositions, by 'grinding the poor to a halt' (as the well known adage on our 'Law and our Courts' declares). We need to bring about changes both in Law and attitudes. The High and Mighty are of opinion that we are still in "Bleak House" Era. The much revered Independence of our Judiciary IS USED to impose on the citizens 'possible' undeclared Government Policies and or organised institutionalised wrong practices. The Government of the day (until recently) washing its hands (as in the N.U.M and other cases in the recent past). Similarly in almost every other case, the victims and the citizen’s tribulations and their complaints used to be and possibly still are brushed aside on the very SAME grounds and with the usual:- "they are the experts, what do you know of the law?" YOU Refer them to CAMILA and the proposed C.A.P’s in the future.

The CAMILA Project needs you as much as you need and will be needing its resources which YOU MUST HELP PUT TOGETHER. The proposed DATA BANK (of THE Citizens’ Alternative Precedents) will seek to and, WILL ESTABLISH the seriousness of and the extent of the situation. 20,000 cases a year (whatever the true figure be) to the Law Society* and the average citizen is none the wiser. Individually citizens have nothing to support their complaints because that is how the system is organised and operates, institutionalised denials of rights by the promoters of crime, those who thrive along with it, as they determine.

THE C.A.P records to be published annually will assist, initially, US (as a group) and the other groups we hope to co-operate with and or represent. The records can be used in arguments with bureaucrats who have had it all their own way for far too long; the C.A.P’s will be sent/submitted to the United Nations, to Luxembourg and to the Human Rights Court in Strasbourg as collective works representing complaints by the citizens who are deprived of their rights and legal representation PROPER on the grounds we are all familiar with. ALL IN CONTRAVENTION OF AND AS A CONSEQUENCE OF VIOLATIONS OF A NUMBER Of Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECoHR) and the United Nations Charter (UNC).

The government and our politicians are now anxious to adopt the ECoHR in our statute books, without taking steps to ensure Independence of the Judiciary implies and means free to enter into JUDICIOUS ONLY DECISIONS, particularly in the Lower Courts. The C.A.P’s can be used in arguments when presenting one's OWN case, in our Courts to CREATE AWARENESS. The legal boffins rely and use common law in support of their arguments to further the ill motivated as ESTABLISHED RULINGS AND their PRACTICES. So can and must be used the alternatives, the C.A.P's, thereby causing changes in attitudes and mentalities, BY ONE AND ALL, towards the average citizen AND THE LAW as Parliament intended it to be and not to be ignored because of other ulterior motives within the very institutions the citizens 'maintain and their officers charged by the state to UPHOLD AND SERVE THE LAW, and no other 'personal' interests.

We are no longer in 'Bleak House' Era and or Times. The citizens are mostly educated and better informed with at the touch of a button information from around the globe. We are reaching for the stars. IT IS TIME FOR OUR LEGAL EXPERTS(!) to reach for their consciousness and so must our 'governing elite', the quangos and the rest of the bureaucrats in government institutions.

TOGETHER we must show and exhibit more than solidarity and support for one another - NOT through listening to each other’s experiences (which mostly follow very much the same pattern) BUT by collective effort to bring about THE Citizens’ Alternative Precedents and through the proposed The Alternative Press (T.A.P) because the media more often than not shy off the serious issues citizens raise; even when the evidence is documented such as blatant FORGERIES.

The CAMILA Project needs individuals and organised groups to collect and collate complaints in the areas listed above. IF YOU ARE WILLING TO HELP and wish to PARTICIPATE in the work that will bring about the proposed annual publications (could start with regular slots and bulletins in order to encourage those partaking) do make contact

email :- camila@human-rights.demon.co.uk

For those of you who take interest in the matters raised above refer to ongoing court cases we publish on this web site.  Follow the practices at and within the courts and the challenges being raised presently in respect of fundamental Human Rights violations. Recognise how and why society and the ordinary citizen is being forced and caused to abandon all principles of decency and HOW VIOLENCE reigns supreme. Recognise WHO ? HOW ? and WHY the need for changes in the application of LAW IF WE, the citizens collectively, ARE to cease the decline imposed on us by the alleged 'knowledge class' in charge of our institutions.

For an insight into the workings of the legal system that has been maintained for centuries by the United Kingdom government log on to this web site. Get to know of the practices presently being challenged in the ongoing court cases. Recognise the practices of the Law Enforcement Agencies and of the society they are creating through defaults and blatant violations of the most fundamental of human rights; that of an unbiased and non-prejudicial Justice system. Recognise the failings to apply Parliament’s Laws to FACTS raised before the United Kingdom Courts; ('Blind, Deaf and Dumb..... sometimes corrupt', declared the Daily Mirror, on 12 May 1992, upon the release of Judith Ward from prison).

Know of the following provisions of Parliament’s Law and apply the provisions to cases and situations you have been / are aware of. Recognise why "Solicitors are bad for your health" and WHO have been acquiescing, encouraging and promoting such practices and VIOLATIONS of human-rights within the United Kingdom, the second worst.........

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (chapter 33) specifically provides for TORTURE under:- section 134:-

(1) A public official or person acting in an official capacity whatever his nationality, commits the offence of torture if in the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another in the performance of his official duties.

(2) A person not falling within subsection (1) above commits the offence of torture, whatever his nationality, if -

(a) in the United Kingdom or elsewhere he intentionally inflicts severe pain or suffering on another at the instigation or with the consent or acquiescence -

(i) of a public official; or

(ii) of a person acting in an official capacity; and

(b) the official or other person is performing or purporting to perform his official duties when he instigates the commission of the offence or consents to and or acquiesces in it.

(3) It is immaterial whether the pain or suffering is physical or mental and whether is caused by an act or an omission.

(4) It shall be a defence for a person charged with an offence under this section in respect of any conduct of his to prove that he had lawful authority, justification or excuse for that conduct.

(5) For the purpose of this section " lawful authority, justification or excuse" means

(a) in relation to pain or suffering inflicted in the United Kingdom, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the part of the United Kingdom where it was inflicted;

(b) in relation to pain or suffering inflicted outside the United Kingdom -

(i) if it was inflicted by a United Kingdom official acting under the law of the United Kingdom or by a person acting in an official capacity under that law, lawful authority, justification or excuse under that law;

(ii) if it was inflicted by a United Kingdom official acting under the law of any part of the United Kingdom or by a person acting in an official capacity under such law, lawful authority. justification or excuse under the law of the part of the United Kingdom under whose law he was acting; and

(iii) in any other case, lawful authority, justification or excuse under the law of the place where it was inflicted.

(6) A person who commits the offence of torture shall be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for life.

135. Proceedings for an offence under section 134 above shall not be begun-

(a) in England and Wales, except by, or with the consent of, the Attorney General; or

(b) in Northern Ireland, except by, or with the consent, of the Attorney General for Northern Ireland.

136.-

(1) Torture shall be deemed to be included in the list of extradition crimes contained in Schedule 1 to the Extradition Act 870.

(2) For the purposes of the Extradition Act 1870 any act or omission, wherever committed, which constitutes torture and or corresponding offences against the law of any State in the case of which the Extradition Act 1870 has been applied by an Order in Council under section 2 of that Act shall be deemed to be an offence committed within the jurisdiction of that State.

DO NOTE that in respect of the above under section 134, paragraphs 4 and 5 "defence, prove justification and any alleged 'lawful authority' (to be relied upon and or used as..." would be in breach Article 3 of the ECoHR and in particular Article 60 that clearly qualifies "Nothing in this Convention shall be construed as limiting or derogating from ANY of the Human Rights and fundamental freedoms which may be ensured under the laws of any High Contracting Party or under any other agreement to which it is a Party". Lest not forget that United Kingdom legal experts played a vital role in drafting the ECoHR, so our Lord Chancellor, Lord Irving, proudly declared not long ago.

Above Parliament's provisions ignored and breached by Public Servants systematically in the purported performance of their public duties. From the police (Stephen Lawrence - ongoing saga and shameful affair through to the matters citizens are exposed in the course of purported court proceedings proper, within the law, national and international). Link to, read and consider your rights (pages) as provided for under the ECoHR as we point out.

Many have personal experiences of torment and torture imposed on them and or other victims of the legal professions and or of officials who act in breach of the above provisions of an Act of Parliament. Many have known of, lived through and or experienced the results of ILL legal services and practices, presently challenged through the courts and these pages. Our LEA's to note; theirs the right is not to misinterpret, misapply, misquote and or to mess with BUT ADHERE TO AND APPLY THE LAW as Parliament intended and as the citizens, within our shores, have been lead to believe and do expect as of RIGHTS PAID FOR THROUGH TAXES; the taxes that meet the high salaries of the neglectful of the law and the abusers of public office. 

The documents and the pleadings PUBLISHED on this web site now and in the weeks and months to follow cover recent and ongoing Court cases. The challenges made of and in the course of the relevant court proceedings established and will establish why the need for T.A.P and the Citizen’s Alternative Precedents (CAP's). Public servants and officials, who negate in their public duties consciously, if not with intent, will be caused to recognise the resolve of the citizens to stand up for their rights. All contributions from the public at large, and any assistance in respect of our propositions will be considered and greatly appreciated.

email:- camila@human-rights.demon.co.uk

Links to:- human-rights Home Page      "The Stephen Lawrence Saga    Your Rights 

Links to:-  Lawrence Inquiry Submissions  Report from OLSO  CAP's Index of cases

Revised: January 16, 2000.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.