Office Supervising Solicitors

	Sign In Sign-Up

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. (access.. /summons.htm)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

The Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman has just published its annual report covering the year 1998/99. We simply draw attention to the obvious which we publish below; no further comment from the victims of the 'system' is warranted the Ombudsman has acted as responsibly and as sensitively as the situation commands. Drawing attention to the fact that the OSS and the Law Society have not pulled their socks up and that they failed to heed the warnings and advice from OLSO suffice.

Last year the 'advise' from OLSO was "...in the absence of any significant and tangible results by the end of 1998, the OSS' promises of to-day could become tomorrow's EMPTY rhetoric. I also warned that, unless solicitors themselves shouldered the responsibility for effective complaints handling, the OSS ran the risk of being overwhelmed by the SHEER VOLUME OF COMPLAINTS with which it was dealing. It gives me no satisfaction to report that my warning message has gone unheeded and my prediction has become reality".

"The Government has made it abundantly clear that it expects the legal profession to operate its complaints - handling systems in the public interest and in a way that inspires public confidence".

The expectations may well be too much for a bankrupt organisation; as we understand it the solicitors indemnity fund has been in the red for decades. Its members should either guarantee its liabilities (if not trading under a guarantee) or cease expecting public servants, in judicial chairs, to entertain the constructive frauds they indulge in systematically at the expense of the public. The latter should bring the message home through instructions from the government that 'fraud in the legal system will no longer be tolerated and that the police and home office WILL ACT in matters that rest on and breach criminal code; any criminal activity must be prosecuted; that should put an end to the tribulations of the much tested public and the OSS will have less complaints. The government HAS TO BE SEEN TO BE ACTING as promised in 1995 when in opposition.

The OSS - grinds to a halt, the Law Society in a mess and the complaints go on rising at the rate of 300 per week. The latest statistics qualifying 1 complaint for every 2.4 solicitors, a mere 42% approximately. Could any industry survive on a 42% returns basis?

NO NEED TO COMMENT. The pile up of the odd 25,000 complaints to which the 300 additions every week speaks loudly. Any decent manager should be able to work out how many new members of staff are needed. Naturally all staff must be ready willing AND ABLE TO DEAL WITH the issues of each complaint AS OPPOSED TO looking for excuses through which to delay and protract; solicitors themselves must be prepared to shoulder responsibility for mistakes and deal with such. The inherent mentality of "...lets create more work for the legal professions and the courts.." HAS TO CEASE if the public is ever likely to have ANY confidence in the legal professions, let alone the court services. When a solicitor admits the practice of ".... reward by paper weight, not quality or service... "© as our founder wrote of in 1975, the system and public servants who entertain the practices and even instigate such activities need proper supervision by laymen who are familiar with 'the system' and are TRULY INDEPENDENT OF IT.

The OSS was called to investigate the case we publish below. The 'Advertiser' is a local free paper and the scanned image below is from the Haringey issue of 20th October 1999.

Intriguing news; The Law Society and the OSS acted against an offending solicitor. Very interesting is the fact that the persons who complained to the Law Society were solicitors themselves. Solicitors, evidently, HAVE RIGHTS unlike ordinary citizens who complain about much more serious issues than failures to appeal. The citizens are milked dry daily as the proverbial cow; they are abandoned by the lawyers who deceive and cheat them through criminal activities that are entertained and endorsed by our Law Enforcement Agencies, as the cases we report and cover in our pages establish. Clear and indisputable criminal activities indulged into in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case.* It is remarkable that they do not treat complaints from the public as readily and in like manner as in the reported instance above. We do have to consider the fact that the offending solicitor did not just ignore the client's right to an appeal. Irrespective if the solicitor was of opinion that the client stood no chance (for argument's sake) AS INDEED HAPPENED on appeal. What was and is intriguing IS THE FACT THAT THE LEGAL PROFESSIONS were obstructed from access to Legal Aid funds for the appeal. When citizens, as PAYING clients, complain about much more serious issues, such as deliberate suppression of material facts and documented evidence, systematically indulged into by solicitous and barristers in their quest for extra work (appeals in corrupted cases standing no chance in our courts) NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE ACTS. Blatant criminal activities by the legal boffins as licensed criminals. The police are fully aware that such activities are CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS on the clients (through abuse of the courts' processes, as the 'proverbial milking of the cow cartoon depicts) the victims can report the criminal activities INCLUDING FALSE DECLARATIONS AND DOCUMENTS such as the blatant FORGERIES used in the Haringey Housing Benefit scams and constructive frauds on the private landlords*, the police simply ignore the FORGERIES and have as yet to prosecute the criminals. Very simply the law does not apply to the legal circles and professions especially so IF THE CRIMES ARE ENDORSED by persons sitting in judicial chairs, misconducting in public office*. The practice certificates of the legal professionals guarantee them immunity from prosecution for any misconduct and or criminal activity indulged into in the course of theatrical productions in our courts.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.