Local Authorities

	Sign In Sign-Up

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. ( access ..../summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

The days of public servants relying on the BLIND DEAF AND DUMB MEDIA ARE OVER, just as the days when ALL relied on BLIND DEAF AND DUMB officers within the law enforcement agencies are also over. This is the age of FREE exchange of information and THE unadulterated FACTS OF LIFE within all states, so long as their citizens are free to exercise AS WE DO, their basic human-rights that ARE GUARANTEED under the European Convention on Human Rights. (ECoHR)

Article 9. "EVERYONE has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion..." Article 10. "EVERYONE has the right to FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION....to HOLD OPINIONS...TO RECEIVE AND IMPART INFORMATION AND IDEAS without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..... (with provisions attached to ) maintaining the authority AND IMPARTIALITY of the judiciary". (NOTE: Impartiality does not imply independence from the restraints of LAW). Article 11. "EVERYONE has the right of freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of ASSOCIATION with others.... rights to form and join ... for the protection of HIS INTERESTS". Article 13. "EVERYONE whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated SHALL have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation HAS BEEN committed by persons acting in an OFFICIAL CAPACITY."

Article 13 is VERY CLEAR. WHERE IS THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY THAT LOOKS INTO THE VIOLATIONS judges in the United Kingdom endorse, entertain AND INSTIGATE of their own? The question is simple and the Lord Chancellor with the Home Secretary should co-operate and produce the formula under which the citizens CAN challenge activities that blatantly breach national law and VIOLATE Human Rights. NOTE PLEASE: We have on record a high court case where the Judge made an issue of the serious ERROR of judgements (practices in our view) by the Ombudsman. All is not as the public is told as the multitude of facts we publish PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT TO THE average citizen. The citizens demand that they be treated no more as illiterate serfs of the middle ages and or as subjects to the whims and or the abusive dishonesty of so called 'public servants'; the 'alleged servants of the public' who serve other ulterior motives* which they fail to declare.*

Below we publish a law report covering aspects attached to shorthold tenancy agreements. No sooner had the judgement below been pronounced by the CoA and a member of staff from Haringey Council, was writing to the landlady and her agent to make assertions contrary to the legal position; the author, we understand is no longer employed at Haringey Council. We have on record other issues that we may be forced to publish if public servants carry on ignoring Parliament's law. The questionable activities of Public Servants within Local Authorities, such as Haringey Council in North London, have been the subject matter of well documented highly questionable acts in breach of The Law* and the principles of law. Irrespective of the law as it was at the time of the CoA Law report we publish below, public servants and two firms of solicitors were indulging themselves AND relying on Legal Aid Certificates to fleece the targeted victim of both firms of solicitors, as with others was arranged.

The Court of Appeal Law Report makes clear both lawyers were ignoring the very ruling.

The letter from the member of staff from Haringey Council in North London went further.

Note the arrogance of the author of the letter. Quoting an Act of Parliament that was years out of date without any reference to the Act under which the Shorthold Tenancy Agreement had been entered into between landlord and tenant. The audacity of the author extended to assertions irrespective of the fact that the tenant HAD already moved out most of her belongings.

WORSE was the insolence of the author and the exposed reliance on the 'relevant county court', the officers, and even the clerical staff, of which were assuming authorities above the jurisdiction and ruling of the Court of Appeal. At least four cases are now being referred to the Lord Chancellor personally; he will be requested to call in the files of all the cases to his office. The Lord Chancellor will be called to justify the activities and the defaults of the officers of 'the relevant county court'. We simply add that in all cases the officers of 'the relevant county court' failed and defaulted, with intent, to issue and grant Judgements resting on Default Summonses arising out of failures by the tenants to remit RENTS to their landlords. We add that the tenants in two of the cases HAD BEEN RECEIVING HOUSING BENEFIT while the council staff were asserting and alleging the tenants had either not furnished them with the essential information and or documents to process the claim OR that they, the staff, had been unable to process the applications because of lost and or misplaced files, and if not, because their computer system had failed, crashed, etc., etc. The 14 days rule for interim payments ALWAYS ignored when targeting specific victims of the scams and fraudulent activities.

EVEN WORSE, in one instance, the tenant allegedly was given a substantial amount of funds through use of a FORGERY, failed to remit the contracted rents to the landlord AND THE COUNCIL STAFF defaulted to submit the FORGERY THEY RELIED UPON AND USED (which they kept IN THEIR FILES for almost a year) TO THE POLICE even though so invited to do. You, the citizens of the world, the Jury, are called upon to refer to The LAW* document we publish on our web-site. The LAW is succinct and clear:- INDICTABLE OFFENCES for aiding a person to evade / default to meet EXISTING LIABILITIES.

HARINGEY COUNCIL STAFF KNEW NO BOUNDARIES. They recognised no law, yet asserted many a fraudulent misrepresentation through and because of reliance on 'the relevant .....................' and the author of the letter dared refer to an Act of Parliament, irrespective of the terms of the Shorthold Tenancy Agreement.

We publish below the REPORT in the Hornsey and Crouch End Journal of 31st December 1998. It covers the fact that the Council was to benefit from extra cash from central government after an explicit letter, dated 18 December 1998, was sent to the Rt. Hon. Jack Straw, the Home Secretary.

DO NOTE that the �10 difference between the 'average 2 bedroom flat' (�190) and the rent the local letting agency 'negotiated with the tenants and or the local authority staff, on behalf of their principals' (�180) was not enough for the participating in the scams dishonest participants.. The property owner was meant to receive officially �165 per week. The �165 per week purportedly was the rent approved for the property by a rent officer. The rent officer, conveniently, on the pay roll of the local authority. Rent for the very property had been negotiated, earlier, at �220 per week through another co-operating letting agent / agency. It was not enough to negotiate(?) and to 'arrange for a new contracted rent' below market value for the property and to assert / declare to the landlord that it merited even less through/by the tenant. The tenants asserted to the landlords that the new approved rent was only in the sum of �145 per week. WORSE, the tenants were encouraged to remit to the landlord only OCCASIONALLY rent for the property. The tenants thus built up, under various pretexts with assistance from the local authority staff, a substantial debt. The staff of the local authority then CHOSE TO IGNORE the maximum 8 weeks rent/debt rule, and acted in breach of the provisions of the THEFT AND COUNTERFEIT ACTS OF PARLIAMENT. After remitting funds to the indebted tenants, in contravention of the aforementioned rule and ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, they advanced, promoted and relied on USE OF A FORGERY in futile attempts to justify their failures to remit ANY rents to the landlord and or to the co-operating in the scams letting/managing agents. THE EVIDENCE is too clear and the police indulge in the usual games for months. As in the Stephen Lawrence Saga*; they have other priorities to serve*. OMISSIONS, defaults to take a statement from the person who submitted copies of the initial and two subsequent FORGERIES to them; the person who has full knowledge of the facts they have chosen to ignore for months, merely because they do not wish the facts and the evidence recorded, as in many other instances. Reckless indifference for no good cause safe the promotion of CRIME through endorsement, if not contempt for the rights in law of the victims.

MANY the submissions to all; including the police who were called in to conduct an investigation proper BECAUSE OF THE FORGERY that gave birth to the other two FORGERIES. They were meant to charge the OFFENDERS, the criminals who indulged in THEFT through deception, dishonesty and misappropriation of funds (moneys belonging to others). The main offenders sitting, for over a year, on a section 9 Statement signed by the victim of all, the landlord. The offenders did make USE OF AND RELIED ON BLATANT FORGERIES yet the police have been dragging their feet for MONTHS. Naturally the 'relevant county court and its officers' were made aware of the scams and the frauds on the private landlords and THE STATE, THE Social Security FUNDS. Nothing but misconduct in public office* and endorsement of CRIME.

We publish below A NEWSPAPER REPORT covering the scams they were caused to deal with. OUR FOUNDER CAUSED the scams to be EXPOSED in the local papers following years of frustrating work and volumes of paper work imposed by the corrupt and the corrupted. Many had been closing their ears and their eyes. They had nothing to say on the serious issues presented to them. ALL ignored the evidence and the facts, safe that certain actions taken were pre-emptive activities. The documented evidence, masses of letters etc., can never be erased and or ignored by any decent citizen, now.

Our founder first became aware of the facts of life at Haringey in March/April 1996. For months lies and fabrications (recorded, audio tapes) attached to inexcusable falsehoods (fully covered by The LAW* we publish on our web-site) were advanced, promoted and relied upon by the criminals in the confines of the local authority. As we put these pages together, now, we are waiting for 'The LAW' to be applied in the very serious case of the FORGERIES used and relied upon by the criminals. Through the FORGERIES diverting and denying access to funds, the properties of the targeted victims. Private landlords seen and treated as easy prey by the dishonest who relied and still appear to be relying on 'public servants to default'; to misconduct in public office. We will not hesitate to publish ALL of the documented evidence at our disposal IF THE INTENDED VICTIMS are not fully recompensed in every respect. The victims must receive forthwith the rents they ARE OWED and have been denied access to for far too long through THE SCAMS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS ONE AND ALL INDULGED IN.

We publish also a more recent NEWSPAPER REPORT covering the very issues as the report above. THE FACTS OF LIFE as reported in the Daily Mail on 8th April 1999.

The fact remains that for over three years we had been drawing attention to the unacceptable behaviour of far too many members of staff at Haringey Council. Our submissions and letters were ignored by one and all. ALL asserting in much the same arrogance their reliance on others to misconduct in public office* and to ignore The Law* as we were pointing out and the Daily Mail promoted in their article / investigation in June 1997. Our submissions and the evidence we were referring to all, including the Daily Mail predate the article; our letters to many also predate the said report. The �800 million is a very low estimate when one considers the knock on effect, the waste of resources and the ABUSE of the Legal Aid facilities by rogue lawyers* as the lord chancellor's department referred to members of the profession 'using' refugees in scams such as we have had to challenge for over 15 months on behalf of the targeted victims. One couple, private landlords, invested for their retirement in a pension earning property; the landlords wishing NOT to be a burden on society. HOWEVER OTHERS had their plans for their properties; building and rents. Funds due and payable under the terms of SHORTHOLD TENANCY agreements siphoned off - misappropriated.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.