Breeding Grounds CAP case

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. ( access ..../summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

THE CAMILA PROJECT

( Citizens Against Maladministration In Law Application )

email:- camila@human-rights.demon.co.uk

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

The case that disclosed nothing wrong to the experts within the Lord Chancellor's office and Department. Read it and judge for yourself and access a typical response*.

This is the case of a cowboy building contractor. I was and to this day I remain the victim of that contractor, AND the victim of Public Servants, who saw fit and persistently attempted to abuse their Public offices in order to assist other Public Servants who had acted in Breach of their Public Duties; also in gross Violations of Human Rights. Rights to which our Government subscribes to; some of which are enshrined in National Laws. The case was before a County Court; that Court featured in an article of 'The Times' newspaper. Pronouncements made in that article in no way reflect reality Because Practice Is Far Removed From Preaching.

That builder, contracted to do specific repair works but defaulted to act as had been agreed. After securing more than the specified moneys in advances (because of promises to finish in two days) he threatened and even attempted to incite two of his workers to use physical violence in order to extract more funds from me; this after their workmanship had proved to be poor and the contractor had been told to make good the bad works. The contractor elected instead "to steal by taking away" (to an unknown destination without consent) properties of mine. Those acts of theft the police permitted and acquiesced; (they had been seen and called earlier because of the threats to life and property:- "I will blow you and your properties to pieces"). AND the young police constable, who was attending, also refused to order the contractor (whose calling card was lacking) to give any address where he could be contacted and legal proceedings could be served. The constable, took the contractor away and spoke to him in private, then declared, "You want his address ? Get your solicitor to write to me! These events were witnessed.

The contractor thus encouraged, in the evening of the same day, accompanied by two others came to my residence where ones again he threatened me and in the presence of my wife and two children attempted to attack me with a roundels bat. I avoided being embroiled in acts of physical violence (I do not subscribe to the use of any force) and I was telephoning the police when he threatened my wife and children with the words:- "We will petrol bomb you and burn you alive". Those threats were followed by damages to our house and the smashing of a ground floor window pane. Earlier I had taken steps to make the contractor/thief realise he was not going to get away with what he had embarked upon, with or without help as I had warned him. By the time the police arrived, that evening, he and his mates had gone away. Full particulars from my wife, our children, and myself were given to the police.

A few days later the contractor had no option but to return the properties he stole. Even at that stage he refused to give any address and went as far as to threaten me with legal proceedings he was proposing to institute in respect of alleged non-payment for the works he and his mates had carried out. His allegations did not reflect facts and such threats/intimidation after he had become aware he could not treat me as he would have liked (and had been encouraged). Amongst the steps I had taken were photographic and video evidence of the bad works carried out by the contractor and his workers/mates. The police evidently had defaulted to arrest and or charge him for any of the acts he had indulged upon against myself, my family and my properties, in furtherance of their colleagues' failures and their exhibited mentality towards me and my family (those who had been briefed and called upon, from the onset, in my efforts to contain matters within the law). I had, in the meantime, contacted and briefed solicitors. Later I received a letter from the contractor giving me notice of an intended County Court action by him! Yet again he failed to disclose any address where I could send my response to his allegations. His persistence necessitated further investigations by me and reference, yet again, to the police because of the threat to my wife and children.

He did issue, weeks later, a County Court Summons, claiming the maximum he could allege under the small claims procedures relying on an automatic arbitration, ruling. When the Summons reached me it was blatant he was seeking to act fraudulently in the course of the proceedings which, as he had stated in his letter earlier, He Had Been Advised To Institute by County Court staff. The Summons was endorsed with a wrong postal area for my address, despite the fact he had correctly addressed his letter to me earlier. Because of the post code factor I received the Court Summons late; I therefore elected to enter and serve my own Defence and Counter-Claim. Therein I specifically pleaded the belated serving of the Summons (essential pleading in the circumstances; most solicitors would dismiss that factor as irrelevant and immaterial and would not plead it in the court proceedings). I delivered the documents personally to the County Court, well within time from the date of service. The following day I telephoned to ensure these had reached the right Court officer. In a covering letter I specifically drew the Court's attention to the late arrival (misdirection in the post) because of the wrong postal area given to them by the building contractor.

Months later I received my documents, including my letter which was specifically addressed to the Chief Clerk. Attached to them was a Court Memorandum stating that a Judgement had allegedly been entered for and by the contractor! Upon receipt I telephoned the Court and demanded a meeting with the Chief Clerk; I stated that I was to make my way to the Court and I expected him to specifically make time for me before the day was over. Eventually, when I met with him , he asserted that it was too late and that there was nothing he could do! I told him that not all citizens are feed for the fodder ("you should have seen a solicitor ..." advise!). I then pointed out to him that the Court has powers to set aside any judgement secured fraudulently and or through deceit on the Court itself (in fact the Court has powers to bar the offending party from further proceedings). I warned him that unless he saw to it that the Court exercised its duties properly I would act. I demanded that a copy of the declared Judgement/Order be forwarded to me (no such document had to that date reached me!). I asked also for a copy of the application for judgement, by the contractor, "alleging and resting on default grounds" (this was important because of the wrong postcode and because of the advise he had received); there are more revelations and documented facts on the issue of "the application for Judgement on alleged Default Grounds". I had, from the onset of the meeting, shown to the Chief Clerk both of the envelopes in which the Court's staff had posted:- (a) initially the Summons and (b) subsequently my letter, the Defence and Counter-Claim documents; (copy for service by the Court to the building contractor). Both envelopes were endorsed with other postal areas to which both had been routed and re-routed before eventually reaching me. I also pointed out that it took the Court's staff a very long time indeed to return my documents and I questioned the return of the letter addressed specifically to him. The documents, I pointed out to him, were actually delivered by me to the Court only one day after the alleged "judgement" had been entered!

In the meantime (FIVE MONTHS ON) the police had failed to institute any proceedings against the fraudster for the criminal damages to our home and the threats to our lives and home. The threats caused us to live elsewhere for a few days and had introduced a tense atmosphere in our lives, with arguments between me and my wife who was persistently demanding of me to capitulate to the fraudster’s demands. (there are other DOCUMENTED REVELATIONS of what happened after that meeting with the County Court chief Clerk)

Following our meeting the Chief Clerk wrote to state that he had referred the matter to the District Judge, at the close of business on the same day, and that the judgement against me was set aside. (what of my succinct letter, when serving my Defence and Counter-claim which should have indicated to the Court's staff they should and ought to conduct the Court's business diligently? WHY post it back? TOO LATE? NOTHING!!!!

FOR A FURTHER THREE MONTHS the police were failing to come up with any answers to my demands for clarification and or any information as to the position regarding criminal proceedings they should and ought to have instituted from the onset. The Detective assigned to the case delayed taking a statement from me under various pretexts; he also defaulted to attend to my wife and children in order to take statements from them, even though he, his colleagues, and his superiors had been made aware of the stress in the family because of the threats to petrol bomb us. That detective, in the course of some EIGHT MONTHS, had come up with a number of assertions about the use of postal areas "as, how and when it suited the cowboy contractor's intended purposes". The detective's statements and pronouncements were inexcusable at the very least; one could also surmise as incompetent if not deliberate excuses with intent and to promote ulterior motives. Officers of the Court had, in the meantime, issued directions proposing to deal with the claim against me by way of arbitration (No Right Of Appeal) even though I had raised my repeated objections. Coming up to that hearing I investigated further as to the alleged:- "easy to make errors on postal areas to someone who only moved to London recently!" ( by the police). I even took photographs establishing:- (i) that the use of a wrong postal area for the contractor's residence (when he was hiring equipment) could only have been deliberate BECAUSE there EXISTED street signs on the building he lived in and along the road; furthermore HE HAD GIVEN to the Court the right postal area for the purposes of his Court Action!!! and (ii) the contractor was living at home contrary to police assertions such as "he no longer lives there, he has left his wife".

The Court having failed to serve the Defence and Counter-Claim document on him I was left with no option but to serve it by post on him. AND the Court subsequently FAILED TO ENTERTAIN applications from me for an Interim Judgement justified and resting on Default grounds after the building contractor had failed to enter any defence to my Counter-Claim. I WAS OBLIGED (because I was left with no option) to issue and serve a Court Summons on Notice before the date of the fixed "arbitration" hearing. It was essential for me to secure peaceable service of that Summons SO I asked the police to attend in order to avoid any violence and or physical encounters with the contractor. He was at home as I had first established. When I served the Summons on him he threw it and kicked it in the presence of the attending policeman who stated to the contractor:- "I don't know what this is all about mate". I called at his local police station where I raised the issues out of those events. AND the issue of the allegedly long lost contractor (throughout asserted by my local police as information from his local police station). Following a telephone conversation between the two stations I was told the contractor would be arrested and taken to the Magistrates Court under a warrant of arrest which was issued after he failed to attend Court. BY THAT DATE I had never been informed of any proceedings, applications, hearings etc. simply that a warrant for his arrest had been issued. Throughout that period my local police were failing to respond to my telephone calls and letters and persevered in their failures to take any statements from my wife and my two children.

When attending the scheduled "arbitration" hearing I went prepared with the photographic, video and other documented evidence. I was also accompanied by the most pertinent witness to:- (i) the works, (ii) the verbal agreement, (iii) the young police constable's behaviour and assertions / directions / order and INTENTIONS evinced when he was COMMANDING ME To Spend MY Money With Solicitors!! A Small claim against a fraudster!! Unrecoverable solicitors costs!! That police constable's behaviour amounted to BLACKMAIL and gross violation of my human rights. THE USE OF MY PROPERTIES (stolen/deprived) AND MONEYS, without impositions (especially outside the law) by the state and its agents or servants, is a right I HAVE (GUARANTEED UNDER THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION). In Court on that day the District Judge was interested in my origins(!) and got the right reply:- "British Citizen since birth". He elected to accept falsehoods from the fraudster who proclaimed he had not received the Defence and Counter-Claim documents (Recorded Delivery postal service). The District Judge THEREAFTER chose to disregard the Recorded Delivery slip issued by the post office; even worse he chose to disregard a letter from Royal Mail which was backed with a true photocopy of the recipient’s signature. And the District Judge proceeded to issue NEW directions indicating as and how he would have liked for the action to proceed RAILROADING THE COURT ACTION to his predetermined course (more on this last point because he even saw fit to make notes on the Court's copy of the Defence and Counter Claim FOR THE FRAUDSTER HE HAD TAKEN UNDER HIS WINGS and handed it to him). When I asked how soon it would be before I received the Court's Order, in writing, he stated:- "when they have dealt with it" (the office). At this point I refer to the "fraudulently entered Judgement" which was DELIBERATELY POSTED LATE by staff at the Highbury Corner Magistrates Court (covered in my letter to Mr. P Cozens; supported by the attached evidence, document No. 9; note the dates thereon please). Other serious issues indeed arose on that day at the County Court.

Upon receipt of the written Order I entered a properly drafted Appeal STATING all causes and GROUNDS for Appeal including my rights in International Law (European Convention on Human Rights) and the violations of same at and by a Court of Law. On the very day I served my Appeal at the County Court, my local police, who by then had been ignoring me for nearly TEN MONTHS, made several attempts to telephone me (ansaphone calls registered that day 12, BUT NO MESSAGES LEFT!!. This was while I was out attempting to get minority, local and community papers interested in the case. I also visited my Local Authority's race unit. The following day I received a call from the Chief Inspector at my local police station who informed me of the previous day's attempts to contact me. He then told me that the detective in charge of the case, had written to me. Some days later I received a letter that was lacking dates and was in fact posted on the very day I lodged my Appeal at the County Court. I wrote to the detective seeking clarifications and he responded in a letter by stating he had arranged for the arrest of the contractor after I went to serve the Summons on Notice in the presence of the police (the day of the telephone calls between the police stations). Some days later I received also an alleged Judgement from my local Magistrates Court proclaiming a Judgement against the contractor (the Judgement I refer to in my letter to Mr. P Cozens); and that Judgement/Order was endorsed with a date of the day following the service of the Summons (in line with the detective's statement in his second letter). I then wrote to the Magistrates' Court seeking clarifications. In a response I was informed that the Judgement had allegedly been entered some TWO MONTHS BEFORE the date endorsed on the judgement order which, in any event, was ALSO posted AFTER MY NOTICE OF APPEAL was served and filed! at the County Court!! (Human Rights Violations, pleaded). The above facts which are evinced in letters and public records disclosed more than enough. IT WAS BLATANTLY CLEAR THAT THE SCRATCH MY BACK SOCIETY WAS IN OPERATION (alleged Court hearing / order in line with the detective's assertions, and all after my Appeal pleadings). Worse was the fact that the police had only charged the contractor for the smashed window pane and not for the damages to the brickwork. WORSE still they had failed to charge him for the threats to our lives and property, nor for the demands with menaces, nor for extortionate demands, nor for blackmail etc., etc. AND that person, apparently, even got an absolute discharge!!!! so that he can feel free to indulge so again and again; (Imagine that cowboy builder doing work for elderly persons? A matter I raised with the County Court chief clerk in the course of our first meeting). NO WONDER I WAS KEPT IN THE DARK BY THE POLICE, all those months. Intriguing was the fact that although the alleged Magistrates Court Judgement was entered some FOUR MONTHS earlier no such notice was sent to me and NO ENFORCEMENT had taken place in respect of the value of the smashed window pane ONLY; as if the contractor, the police, the Court and or some state agency had made secure our property for the night and subsequently obtained and fitted the replacement window pane. SUCH FAILURES DISCLOSE(D) ENOUGH.

On the date set for the hearing of my appeal (More about County Court Failures on the issue of setting a hearing) I attended the County Court accompanied by my local Mayor (statement secured) and a free-lance reporter. NEITHER of those witnesses were allowed to attend the "hearing!" which was delayed well into the late afternoon. I could have insisted that they be allowed to attend the "private" (behind closed doors) hearing(!) by stating that one person was my McKenzie advisor and the other was to keep notes of the proceedings for me. I chose not to; because it was more important to me, at that stage, to have evidence of denials and obstructions to Justice; it was immaterial if such acts were indulged into selectively and or simply in order to create conditions leading to assisting other Public Servants; those who had failed abysmally to conduct themselves within the guidelines of their respective Public Duties and in accordance with the National Laws they are meant to serve and uphold; also in contravention of International Law. In the course of the "Hearing"(?), which the Judge conducted as and how he would have wished, the Judge attempted and sought to suppress and ignore the PLEADED VIDEO EVIDENCE. He also sought to impose other terms leading to unrecoverable costs and expenditure (small claim, BUT DIRECTIONS for expensive Surveyors Reports; as if the CONTEMPORANEOUS photographs and video EVIDENCE were not enough). At this stage I should add that there are Court provisions which were denied to me all along, just as the interim Default Judgement had been. EVEN worse the judge attempted on a number of occasions to misinterpret the agreement between the contractor and myself because the contractor had used the words "I was employed by" in his Particulars of Claim. I repeatedly had to point out to the Judge that the builder HAD STATED ALSO fixed jobs and fixed sums!. (i.e. "Do Not Rely On That To Deny To Me Justice") Upon receipt of the new Directions, after that "hearing!" of my Appeal I followed up on work I had started with the Lord Chancellor's Department. In a specific letter I stated:- "Can you imagine the state of British Industry if one and all were free to indulge uncontrolled and unsupervised?". This after the usual assertions of non interference in the Courts' business by the Department; the much revered "independence of the Judiciary, and the Courts". In response to my comment a special department came into existence. There followed telephone conversations and letters. Specific letters from me were sent to that department. One was sent as an OPEN LETTER; with it another, CONFIDENTIAL. The Department was challenged and, I stated that I paralleled the case with that of a person who goes to a hospital with a broken leg BUT the doctors there seek to induce a fatal heart attack. I made it clear that whilst the County Court and its officers were in a position to review their mentality to the small claim (broken leg) I was also determined to take the matter of their attempts to deny justice through railroading attempts, and to obstruct me in the quest of my rights (fair, unbiased and non-discriminatory judicial system) to Strasbourg; hence my reference to heart attack for which I reserved and had the right to attend another hospital (Strasbourg in their case). Only a fool would and should rely on the likes of those who indulged, to be judges on themselves and the practices of their colleagues.

When attending Court on a subsequent date to exchange documents (in accordance with the Appeal Judge's directions) I went prepared with other legal documents I prepared (more revelations) a new District Judge was on the bench. The new District Judge (had read all of my communications; so I was informed) used the occasion to enter Judgement for me taking into account the Counter-Claim, the evidence I had prepared, and considered also the time lost in pursuit of my rightful claims through the Court in respect of the initial and subsequent causes of action as had been pleaded and claimed by me. When I was asked of the hours involved in the preparation of all the paperwork and the other documented evidence I stated that though the paperwork was dictated and necessary because of my interest in a Judicial System that ruined my business and almost destroyed me as a person some years earlier with FORGERIES which were freely adduced and indulged into by the legal "experts" and "licensees" with the blessings and the conscious acquiescence of High Court Judiciary; all the way to the Court of Appeal, (The Jewel in the Crown - Case). I was asked if my work and research was likely to lead me to a career in law and I stated that it was not my wish to rub shoulders with criminals, but to expose them. That is why I spent years in researching and studying law and court procedures expending in the process time and money since it had become apparent it was the only way to move forward in a Democracy when something is wrong. IT IS THE ONLY WAY OPEN to force those responsible (in our instance the Houses of Parliament) to act in order to protect the public, the victims of a judicial system where individuals feel free to indulge in order to create income generating conditions for themselves and their circles, through abuses of the Courts' processes whilst denying and corrupting justice. I pointed out to the District Judge that the forgeries, I had referred to, took place in the High Court before the 1981 Forgeries and Counterfeit Act; (NOTE: Criminal activities are not subject to Limitations) in other words at a time when the 1913 Forgeries Act was in force. The earlier Act had provisions for forgeries at Court and on Court documents as well as books of records (such indulgences did take place) and I had such evidence. The Lord Chancellor's Department, the Police, Scotland Yard Fraud Squad and their Complaints Department; also the Director of Public Prosecutions, ALL HAD TURNED A BLIND EYE AND DEAF EARS. ALL ACQUIESCE(D) THE CRIMINAL ABUSES OF THE COURTS' PROCESSES. Abuses of the Courts processes had come to light, I informed the District Judge, in the Mary Winch Affair and in my work I had come across a case wherein those in charge of it had attempted to similarly indulge (dispossess a person from his home; see copy telegram attached). CONSCIOUS if not deliberate obstruction, denial and perversion of Justice). Abuses of the Court’s processes had also come to light in the Judith Ward case. FORGERIES had come to light in the I.R.A ‘bombers’ case who were imprisoned because of scientifically proven FORGERIES by the police.

In this instance, "The Breeding Grounds - Case", the practices and aspects of how one and all (from young policemen and their officers, to County Court staff and the Chief Clerk, through to Magistrates' Court staff and the Chief Clerk) all are seen to be learning through observation and FAILURES TO CHALLENGE malpractice and indulgences COVERED UP BY THEIR SUPERIORS. Thereby all begin to treat such activities as acceptable and NORMAL. And thus they learn how to obstruct, deny, pervert and corrupt Justice. In this case alone the police and Magistrates' Court staff and officers have lent themselves to fabricated material FORGERIES intended to mislead and to support falsehoods. Such acts from trained persons retained by the state in the investigative and administrative branches of Criminal Law. None can plead ignorance of the criminal law and those documented activities, safe perhaps rely on their superiors and colleagues to assert "case not proven" by ignoring the evidence just as the District Judge blatantly indulged into on the day of the 'arbitration hearing'! It is immaterial and irrelevant if when issuing directions on that date it was hoped that solicitors might get their chance for a cut in the cake (as attempted and urged by the chief clerk, the Judges and the Lord Chancellor's Department subsequently, hoping that I would be naive enough to part with the evidence, never to see it again). The documents advanced and indulged into by the police and the Magistrates' Court staff and its officers ARE FORGERIES intended to deceive.

As can be noted from the letters sent to my Member of Parliament and to the Chief Clerk at the Magistrates Court, where the builder was allegedly prosecuted for criminal damage (the smashed window pane only) no enforcement of the alleged Judgement at that or any other Court ever took place. This failure alone, indicates to highly suspect circumstances and it is highly questionable if the police ever really wanted to prosecute that criminal; the 'suspicion' is justified because of all the other collective failures and acts entered into and indulged blatantly by the police, who were relying throughout on the abuses at the County Court to create conditions to Justify their unwillingness to exercise their Public Duties. The Magistrates Court officers may have attempted to assist the police in the advancements of falsehoods, but the police never even attempted to charge the builder for criminal damages UNTIL AFTER THE COUNTY COURT HAD BEEN FORCED TO SET ASIDE THE ALLEGED DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (that alleged Judgement was nothing else but a constructive fraud). It is indeed remarkable that the criminal is stated to have benefited from an "absolute discharge". In other words the police computer records will more than likely carry no records of any of the indulgences the builder embarked upon with the assistance and through encouragement by the police themselves and many a public servant.

Any attempt to justify the delayed posting of the Judgement from the Magistrates Court for two months on grounds for a Means Application and or hearing is suspect. In any event the alleged order granting him time and in particular the AMOUNT AND THE FORTNIGHTLY periods, indicate to a person receiving funds on that basis. That issue alone indicates to the police NEVER HAVING INFORMED THE COURT OF THE TRUE NATURE OF THE DISPUTE between the CONTRACTOR and his victim. In other words the police suppressed evidence pointing to a criminal who was claiming and receiving state benefits WHILST at the same time he was proclaiming in the County Court proceedings other building contracts and hiring of equipment by him. And the police HAD BEEN INFORMED that the criminal they saw fit to protect and aid had been receiving, as he had demanded and insisted, payments in cash. Payments that he acknowledged in the course of the County Court proceedings.

Fortnightly income statement to the Magistrates Court indicates to a person receiving Social Security Benefit! A building Contractor! A person receiving more than that from PUBLIC SERVANTS!!!!

Such is the deplorable state of affairs in our country. National and International Laws are Freely Violated. And Public Servants use their public offices to serve their own ulterior motives if not undeclared Government Policies. And the closing comment observation has to be seen in the context of the SYSTEMATIC FAILURES by Senior Government officials and Ministers' Offices, if not the Ministers themselves to address the issues arising out of repeated complaints to their Offices.

Such Failures can only suggest reliance on the continuance of the systematic, uncontrolled and unchecked ABUSES OF THE COURTS' PROCESSES BY AND THROUGH THE MUCH REVERED INDEPENDENCE OF OUR JUDICIARY.

COPYRIGHT. Application for the use of material from "The Breeding Grounds - case" can be secured only for the use of the material in respect of Court proceedings by ANY citizen within the United Kingdom IRRESPECTIVE OF RACE, COLOUR, CREED, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, ETC., ETC. And for the citizen's presentations to the authorities; to public servants who NOW have no excuse but to deal with the widespread corruption and the abuse of the legal system by "the licensed to act outside the law*". ANY editor of any publication, RADIO and or TELEVISION programme maker within the United Kingdom, ready willing and prepared to REALLY EXPOSE the WIDE SPREAD INSTITUTIONALISED RACIAL DISCRIMINATION instigated by anyone BUT ALWAYS promoted through the higher ranks within most institutions, including the CRE is welcome to apply for permission to use material subject to explicit terms. The documented evidence is and will be made available for the sole purpose of eradicating the anathema promoted by the sycophants and hypocrites building their society of conflicts through which their profits.

PLEASE NOTE that within weeks of a challenge and additional information furnished to the Lord Chancellor's office, through my Member of Parliament, the Lord Chancellor announced the Schooling of 1800 Circuit Judges on Racism* and racial awareness inclusive of different cultures.

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.