Lord Chan. Typ Response

	Sign In Sign-Up

the human-rights web site

email:- violations@human-rights.demon.co.uk

This web-site is dedicated to the memory of the niece of our founder; a fine young lady who was caused to take her own life because of her father's, and his clan's, cruel attitude to her needs. Read about the circumstances that lead to the tragic loss of that life. Consider that it was all because of GREED. Precisely what our legal system serves for the operatives through ILL legal services care of our legal experts and the modus operandi from within. ( access ....../summons.html)

SIX months before taking her own life that fine young lady proclaimed to our founder :- "I can't understand it uncle everyone thinks of bricks mortar and money NO ONE CARES ABOUT PEOPLE".

All underlined text with an asterisk indicates a LINK at the bottom of the page

We publish below a typical response from the Lord Chancellor's office. It covers issues arising out of misconduct in public office* by judiciary'. Read the letter, consider that violations under Article 13 of the ECoHR had been indulged in by far too many public servants. ALL were relying on judiciary to ignore The LAW*. Decide for yourself and join with us to challenge all violations that you have been the victim of and or become aware of in order that we may bring about changes in mentalities to Your Rights*.

'The Breeding Grounds - case'* (for case number and other particulars email CAMILA) was before a County Court. Everything From Within the Court itself was attempted in order to deny to a citizen his rights in law. Download and read the full case (briefly stated) and use it as an example. Learn how to avoid the traps the dishonest and the abusers of public office 'use' as THE facilities at their disposal in order to deny you YOUR RIGHTS systematically and habitually. Public servants are there to serve you, yet they serve other ulterior motives by imposing their own preferences and even undeclared state policies through the much revered independence of the Judiciary who ACT outside the law they are meant to serve and 'to teach the citizens by THEIR example, to uphold and to obey the LAW. Instead they simply ignore ALL law and indulge in constructive frauds, through the legal/judicial MAFIA practices that Geoffrey Harold Scriven's case brought to light as another example of THE SYSTEM THEY operate.

'The Legal/Judicial/Police Mafia' exposed in the Geoffrey Harold Scriven case* establishes beyond any doubt the ORGANISED connections between the allegedly independent judiciary the United Kingdom maintains and the legal circles THEY SERVE, not Justice. It simply confirms the "fraud in the legal system" that was admitted by the Right Honourable Paul Boateng, in 1995, now MINISTER of STATE at the Home Office. To his credit he prefers to be listed as plain Mr Paul Boateng in the UK Government World Wide Web. No ego trips and bloated ideas; just a plain, honourable and sincere member of Parliament whose heart and mind ARE in the right place, as the Home Secretary, he is serving the public with, proved to be in the matter of his son's errors.

Recognise how to challenge abuses of the 'independence of the judiciary'. The next time you get a letter from the Lord Chancellor's Department referring to that excuse and Justification point out that the 'revered' independence implies that the judiciary should uphold the law without interference from any other; it does not imply INDEPENDENCE TO IGNORE THE LAW as in the threatened copyright infringement case, the serialisation of the book 'The Downing Street Years'*. The Court of Appeal determined in that instance that copyright Law exists only for the ordinary citizen to be penalised whereas those who can afford to violate the law should be allowed so to do IN ORDER that there should be another court case for the legal boffins to benefit from AS DIRECTED by the Court of Appeal in its determination at the time. Our Judiciary are there simply to generate appeal after appeal and case after case thereby providing endless cases for our courts and for the circles from within which they arose to Judicial (note the word) office / chair. And there exist no provisions for anyone, let alone the citizens as in the United States, to challenge appointments of 'persons' to judicial office.

THE above letter IS typical of responses citizens receive from the Lord Chancellor's department. NOTE the STEREOTYPE answer "INDEPENDENCE of the judiciary ......(to ignore the law, the evidence and to ACT outside the law) because of other vested interests, as the many cases we shall refer to establish.

Note the obvious:- (a) "this" in the singular, (b) "countries" in the plural (c) the apostrophe in the plural goes after the 's' and not before the 's'. Needles to say the author should go back to school to learn English and the Lord Chancellor received such a suggestion from the citizen. Notice how the author was patronising, 'may I suggest'.... The citizen complains about serious issues such as corrupt practices (the abuse of office simply to generate income for the circles from within which judges, in the United Kingdom, arise to public office) and the citizen is treated with contempt and or as a moron by an illiterate. FURTHER NOTE the reference to the alleged existence of a constitution in the country that had NONE apart from the Magna Carta. The citizen eight years on is still waiting to hear from the author of the letter where copy of this countries (????) written constitution can be secured. AND FURTHER NOTE that the author, a presumed well versed in the available services (the CAB in this instance) knows not that the service he refers to is the ADVICE bureau and not an ADVANCE bureau; perhaps in the author's mind all from within that service are as advanced in ENGLISH, LAW and how to cover up corruption as the author of the letter. ALSO all NOW can SEE that the letter WAS SIGNED by the author and therefore ALL can deduce that the author was as careful and DILIGENT when he was reading the citizen's DETAILED complaint as when the author was reading the letter he is presumed to have dictated to another within the Lord Chancellors Department; that other as illiterate in English as the author himself. Naturally the author is also presumed to have been as DILIGENT and careful as the judge/judges he hastened to absolve of any wrong doing because the unwritten Constitution of the United Kingdom provides for ITS JUDGES TO BE INDEPENDENT OF or ignorant of PARLIAMENT'S CRIMINAL LAW.

NOTE: Judges are meant to enter into Judicious decisions founded and resting on both FACT and LAW, with due consideration of THE EVIDENCE presented to them; not to express personal opinions, JUST decisions that rest and are founded on the evidence before them and not as their own other interests dictate*. Refer to "The Downing Street Years"* as a typical example of practices

Copyright subsists on all material on our web-site, owned by the authors of same.